In February 1921 the first, though unsuccessful, transatlantic attempt involved 25 US stations transmitting and over 250 British amateurs enrolled as receiving entrants.3<\/a><\/sup> The test had been originally proposed and planned in 1920 by M. B. Sleeper, the radio editor of Everyday Engineering<\/i>.\u00a0 But after the magazine ceased publication later that year, Sleeper asked ARRL to take over the operation.\u00a0 With little time left to fully reconsider how to run it, the ARRL Operating Department stepped in.\u00a0 Coded messages (which they called \u201carbitrary signals\u201d) were assigned to the transmitting stations, and logged reception reports were compared for accuracy. Although many signals were heard but not copied, none could be conclusively shown to represent a completed reception. In the twenty years since Marconi\u2019s crossing, the criteria for what constituted a valid reception had become much more stringent\u2014a single letter \u2018S\u2019 would no longer suffice. After all, in Marconi\u2019s case, his station had been easy to identify since it was the only one on the air.<\/p>\n While gratefully acknowledging the cooperation and enthusiasm of British hams, ARRL secretary Kenneth Warner attributed the failure to their outdated receiving equipment and an understandable lack of experience in DX work, both of which the Americans had developed only after \u201cyears of patient struggle.\u201d With new equipment and expertise he was confident of success next time. \u201cWe would bet our new spring hat that if a good U.S. amateur with [a more modern] set and an Armstrong Super could be sent to England, reception of U.S. amateurs would straightway become commonplace,\u201d wrote Warner. The bet would eagerly be taken up and doubled down.<\/p>\n After considering other deficiencies that might have contributed to failure in the first test, the organizers developed improved procedures.\u00a0 A second attempt would take place on the evenings of 8 through 17 December.4<\/a><\/sup> The new plan would give \u201ceach transmitter a fair chance to accomplish this almost unbelievable feat.\u201d To be eligible to participate in the test a station would first have to be shown capable of reaching 1,000 miles by doing so in an over-land qualifying test in November. Phillip R. Coursey, assistant editor of The Radio Review<\/i> in London and operator of 2JK (British), was in charge of all receiving operations and would determine the winners after reports had been received. Coursey had also officiated in the previous unsuccessful tests in February. The announcement in QST<\/i> referred to the event as a \u201ccontest\u201d\u2014maybe the first DX contest, albeit one in which all contacts were one-way only.<\/p>\n Late 1921 was a particularly busy period. In the midst of the phone boom and plans for the transatlantic tests, the ARRL held its first national convention in Chicago from 31 August through 3 September, including \u201cthe biggest banquet ever held in the history of Amateur Radio.\u201d October QST<\/em>\u2019s coverage filled more than fourteen pages\u2014its cover boasted that all districts were represented and featured a picture of a group to prove it 5<\/a><\/sup>. Well organized and attended, the convention had been \u201ctwo big hotels full of bugs chewing the sock until break o\u2019 dawn every morning.\u201d<\/p>\n A message arrived at the convention from US Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover. The man who would be elected president seven years later referred to his department as the \u201cPatron Saint of Amateur Wireless Operators,\u201d and called amateur radio \u201ca very important movement.\u201d The message arrived via radiogram, of course.<\/p>\n Maxim, in his opening address, reflected on the historic nature of the first convention and how far amateurs had come in organizing since those first days in Hartford. He predicted that nothing could stop relaying from going worldwide, and in a thinly veiled political statement envisioned a day \u201cwhen private citizens may communicate without cost from the shores of the great far-flung Pacific on the west to the limits of civilized co-operation and good government on Europe\u2019s east.\u201d<\/p>\n An evening session featured many well known speakers including DeForest, Armstrong, A. H. Taylor, L.M. Clausing, and R F. Gowen, along with Frank Conrad of 8XK radiotelephone fame. CW was the hottest topic of the technical sessions and a \u201cCW Night\u201d was devoted to that mode entirely. Professor C. M. Jansky6<\/a><\/sup> of the University of Minnesota presented a paper on the superiority of CW to spark by comparing operating experiences. Not everyone had been convinced, however, and Warner read two letters from \u201cSpeedo Vermilya, 1ZE\u201d about spark\u2019s superiority. The debate continued; the only consensus was that the coming season of on-air work would likely decide the matter.<\/p>\n The ARRL Board of Direction met to discuss the transatlantic test and decided unanimously to appropriate funds to send a US ham to England to ensure success.<\/p>\n Paul Forman Godley grew up in Kansas and spent his late teen years working as a telegraph operator for railroads and other companies. Enthralled with wireless at a young age, he read whatever material he could find about it, such as articles in Scientific American<\/em>. In 1908 at age 19 he managed at last to become involved in wireless at a commercial firm in Chicago. Impressed with his enthusiasm and expertise, his superiors put him in charge of the United Wireless station in Grand Rapids before he turned 20. Over the next four years he found himself in a whirlwind of wireless work: a student at the University of Illinois, installing equipment and designing courses on wireless in Texas, on assignment as \u201cwire chief\u201d of the Post Office in New York, and on the Amazon River helping to develop a radio service for the Brazilian government.<\/p>\n Paul F. Godley<\/p><\/div>\n Finally settling in New Jersey in the summer of 1914, he built a station, 2ZE, broke all distance records with it, and designed a new regenerative receiver that became very popular among amateurs. Presenting his designs to the R.C.A., and publishing them in QST<\/i>, he was widely credited with being the first to adapt the Armstrong regenerative circuit to shortwave amateur use. As an engineer at the Adams-Morgan Company he developed their Paragon<\/em> line of receivers based on this design, and later at the Marconi Company he designed military receiving equipment for use during the war. In 1918 he married, started a family, and later started his own company in Montclair.<\/p>\n By late 1921 Godley, now 32, was a senior member of the radio establishment, both amateur and professional, and widely recognized as an expert in shortwave reception\u2014one of an elite few.\u00a0 Therefore, it would be \u201cParagon Paul\u201d whom the ARRL would dispatch to England to anchor the receiving end of the next transatlantic tests.7<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n Godley would be sent specifically to supplement the British efforts with American expertise using American apparatus.8<\/a><\/sup> Judged by the ARRL board as \u201cAmerica\u2019s best authority and best operator in short wave receiving,\u201d he would sail to England aboard the Aquitania<\/em> on 15 November to prepare for the December operation. Meanwhile, he would be building and selecting the best equipment he could find to cover the shortwaves.<\/p>\n It wasn\u2019t that the British hams were not up to the task, as had been suggested by a French magazine. After all, it was England to which the American and Canadian hams had looked for early supplies of vacuum tubes after the war. But, as QST<\/i> amusingly put it, \u201cthe British are not such \u2018Boiled Owls\u2019 as we North American hams and do not, as a class, relish staying up to all hours.\u201d And since the ARRL would never be so impolite as to ask them to do so, \u201cit was at first thought that the transmitting schedules would have to be limited. But the sending of an American amateur changes this so that not only will the special stations have individual schedules but everybody else can enter who will.\u201d<\/p>\n Perhaps the most important change from the February attempt was that in addition to scheduled operations of the more powerful, qualifying stations, everyone else was invited to join in too. The organizers explicitly wanted this test to be a \u201cfree for all in which everybody can participate.\u201d QST<\/i> reminded readers that the proper direction to favor was northeast since signals followed the great circle route. Therefore those on the Atlantic coast would not necessarily have an advantage.<\/p>\n The test would consist of ten nights of six-hour sessions, from 7 thorugh 16 December , and run from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. Eastern Time in the US. The \u201cfree for all\u201d session would run from 7:00 until 9:30, when stations could transmit according to time slots assigned in fifteen-minute intervals assigned by district. Qualifying stations would then transmit for the second interval beginning at 9:30, according to a schedule of fifteen-minute periods, the sequence of which would be rotated each night. Two or three stations shared each time slot and would transmit simultaneously.<\/p>\n Each of the qualifying stations would transmit five-letter coded messages, called \u201csecret cipher combinations,\u201d that were sealed in envelopes not to be opened until the tests began. The identities of the 27 stations were likewise kept secret, and included 20 CW and 7 spark transmitters. Among them were 1AW (Maxim), 1ZE (Vermilya), 6XH (Stanford University) and 9ZN (Mathews).<\/p>\n ARRL Traffic Manager Schnell would send the schedule and station list to only Coursey, and seal his own copy in the safe at ARRL Headquarters. Godley, who would report through Coursey just as the other listeners would, only knew the free-for-all schedule as did the general public. Coursey would give him and all the other listeners information about schedules and wavelengths, but would keep the station identities and cipher groups secret.<\/p>\n Public interest in the test ran high in Europe, especially in the Netherlands, France, and Britain, where details were published in their national radio journals. A Burndept III Ultra<\/em> receiver would be awarded by Burnham & Co. of England, as announced by Mr. W. W. Burnham, \u201cone of England\u2019s leading amateurs.\u201d9<\/a><\/sup> The prize would go \u201cto the A.R.R.L. member whose signals rank first in the reception in the British Isles,\u201d though it was unclear how the ranking would be judged.<\/p>\n British Marconi station MUU at Carnarvon planned to transmit nightly test reports at 2:00 a.m. EST. In QST<\/i>, A. L. Groves described apparatus he recommended for receiving MUU on 14,200 meters while dealing with possible QRM from NSS on 16,900, WGG on 16,100, and WII on 13,600. In particular, he noted that in some nearby areas NSS and WGG heterodyne with each other creating a problem within \u201cthree or four thousand meters of these waves.\u201d<\/p>\n In an example of how exquisitely complicated tuning an advanced receiver was in his day, Groves instructed readers that:<\/p>\n With Duo-Lateral coil 1500 in the secondary, shunted by a 43 plate (.001mfd.) condenser, WII tunes in at about 50 degrees on the 180 degree scale, and MUU should tune in at not over 53 degrees. The filament and B battery are of course adjusted in the usual manner; then the secondary condenser is adjusted to approximately the figures above indicated. The plate coil is gradually brought closer to the secondary until the tube oscillates which is indicated by a “thud” in the phones. With the primary coil about 2 to 2-1\/2 inches from the secondary, slowly vary the primary condenser until the set is \u201cbalanced out.\u201d After signals are picked up they can be brought in clearer and stronger by further adjustment of primary coupling, accompanied by slight changes in primary condenser. After that a slow loosening of the plate coupling will almost always give additional amplification.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Today this seems rather like running through an alignment procedure each time you tune your receiver to a new frequency.<\/p>\n Inside, a photograph captured Schnell and Warner on board the Aquitania<\/em> seeing Paul Godley off on his voyage to England. A send-off dinner had been held for him in New York the night before departure, attended by luminaries including Maxim, Hebert, Camp, Stewart, Service, Goette, E. H. Armstrong, J. Andrew White, P.H. Boucheron, G. H. Burghard, and W. S. Smith. Among the testimonials, Armstrong was quoted as saying, \u201cI\u2019ll stake my scientific reputation on Paul Godley.\u201d10<\/a><\/sup> It\u2019s hard to imagine a stronger endorsement.<\/p>\n On the morning of 15 November, The Aquatania<\/i> was set to sail for England.\u00a0 Amid the commotion of the multitude at the dock and on board the departing ship, the \u201cradio birds\u201d used opening-closing hand gestures to send Morse code messages back and forth to Godley standing at the ship\u2019s railing above all the QRM of the crowd.11<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n By coincidence, Dr. Harold H. Beverage, inventor of the wave antenna,12<\/a><\/sup> also happened to be aboard Aquitania<\/em> for this voyage, something neither Godley nor anyone else in the crowd had known beforehand. Recognizing the well-known radio experimenter at the railing a short distance from Godley, the group on the dock let him know via this hand-Morse. Godley immediately went over to introduce himself, the two having never before met in person. Beverage, who had noticed the gesturing too, signaled \u201cOK\u201d to the crowd as he shook hands with Godley\u2014a striking metaphor for what was to come.<\/p>\n Warner, Godley, and Schnell aboard the Aquitania just before it sailed for England.<\/p><\/div>\n Godley carried with him information about the final schedules and the all-important cipher combinations, messages that were known ahead of time only to ARRL Traffic Manager Schnell, in a sealed packet that Coursey would open and become the only person to know them on the receiving side of the Atlantic.<\/p>\n In addition to the nightly reports transmitted by MUU, Beverage\u2019s station, 2BML, manned by operators from RCA\u2019s Long Island receiving station in Riverhead, New York, would retransmit the reports on 200-meter CW. ARRL gratefully acknowledged the help of both companies, Marconi and RCA.<\/p>\n Godley\u2019s own twenty-page account of the entire operation, including much of his minute-by-minute log, appeared in February 1922 QST<\/i> and makes interesting reading.<\/p>\n For several nights after leaving New York \u201cthe amateur air was thick with farewells and good wishes for 2ZE, Godley\u2019s home call, for everybody knew he would be in the static-room on the Aquitania,<\/i>\u201d wrote Warner. And so he was, spending much of his time with the operators in the radio room, enjoying their hospitality. Although he had access to the ship\u2019s station, there was no time to tune for amateur signals because of the high volume of regular message traffic.13<\/a><\/sup> He nevertheless received messages from US friends via commercial wireless transmissions to the ship. A message from ARRL that he copied himself on his second day at sea read:<\/p>\n From Hartford, Conn. He replied, \u201cConfidence increases as distance squared. Broadcast my heartfelt appreciation.\u201d Heartened by the well-wishers\u2019 messages, he resolved to \u201cget signals or bust!\u201d Keeping in mind the skepticism and what he termed \u201cveiled interest\u201d from the engineering community of which he was a member, and feeling that no ham in Britain believed the test would succeed, Paul Godley was eager to prove them all wrong.<\/p>\n de W2PA<\/span><\/p>\n Marconi had first done it back in 1901. For amateurs, crossing the Atlantic was the next natural challenge\u2014they had been thinking about it since before the war. Many in the scientific community were skeptical that such a feat could possibly be achieved at such a short wavelength as 200 meters, especially with power as low as one kilowatt. An early rumor that American signals had been received in Europe appeared in the press in December 1920.1 The new record, the … Continue reading ![\"BT](\"http:\/\/w2pa.net\/HRH\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/BT-sep-sm.bmp\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n![\"QST](\"http:\/\/w2pa.net\/HRH\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/MG_0797-Godley-678x1024.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"QST](\"http:\/\/w2pa.net\/HRH\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/MG_0815-Dec-21-QST-678x1024.jpg\")
The December 1921 QST<\/i> cover drawing by 8ZZ announced \u201cTransatlantic Tests This Month\u201d in large type across a globe where lightning bolts linked North America to England and \u201cQRM Babies\u201d were lashed tightly to the north pole spike where they presumably could do no harm. In America, a ham sits at his station keying his transmitter with The Old Man looking on. In England a ham listens intently through headphones tightened firmly in place with a C-clamp over his head. Another gentleman looks on, perhaps the British equivalent of T.O.M., or perhaps Mr. Burnham.<\/p>\n![\"QST](\"http:\/\/w2pa.net\/HRH\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/MG_0762-Aquitania-799x1024.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\nTo Paul F. Godley, SS Aquitania via WBF.
\nBon Voyage! The entire radio world is pulling for you!
\n(Signed) Warmaxnell14<\/a><\/sup><\/p><\/blockquote>\n![\"AR](\"http:\/\/w2pa.net\/HRH\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/AR-sep-sm.bmp\")
<\/p>\n\n